12 angry essay man summary

While most of the men are aware of the stigma attached to people from the ghetto they are willing to try to put the stereotype aside. Soon afterward, Juror 11 George Voskovec questions whether it is reasonable to suppose the defendant would have fled the scene, having cleaned the knife of fingerprints but leaving it behind, and then come back three hours later to retrieve it having been left in his father's chest.

His speech offends Juror 5, who turns his back to him, and one by one the rest of the jurors start turning away from him. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning 12 angry essay man summary communicate and deal with each other.

Plot[ edit ] In a New York City courthouse a jury commences deliberating the case of an year-old boy [11] from a slum, on trial for allegedly stabbing his father to death. Increasingly impatient, Juror 7 changes his vote to hasten the deliberation, which earns him the ire of other jurors especially 11 for voting frivolously; still he insists, unconvincingly, that he actually thinks the boy is not guilty.

Juror 3 gives a long and increasingly tortured string of arguments, ending with, "Rotten kids, you work your life out! He is the tenth to vote "not guilty"; played by Ed Begley. The look on his face shows he has a realization. However, Juror 9 Joseph Sweeney reveals that he himself changed his vote, feeling that Juror 8's points deserve further discussion.

Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis

By recognizing his unconscious emotions, essentially what he has done is level with himself. Final closing arguments having been presented, a visibly bored judge instructs the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty of murder. Weiler of The New York Times wrote, "It makes for taut, absorbing, and compelling drama that reaches far beyond the close confines of its jury room setting.

Confused and disturbed by this reaction to his diatribe, Juror 10 continues in a steadily fading voice and manner, slowing to a stop with "Listen to me. The synopsis below may give away important plot points. Juror 8 cannily asks Juror 4 if he wears his eyeglasses to sleep, and Juror 4 admits that he does not wear them nobody does.

Juror 11 then changes his vote. The judge further informs them that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. These men have never talked before.

However, Juror 9 reveals it was he that changed his vote, agreeing there should be some discussion. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty.

He bursts, accusing the others of being crazy. Juror 3 finally loses his temper and tears up a photo of himself and his son, then suddenly breaks down crying and changes his vote to "not guilty", making the vote unanimous. Davis and 9 Mr. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback.

He is the last to vote "not guilty"; played by Lee J.

Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis

Juror 10 then vents a torrent of condemnation of slum-born people, claiming they are no better than animals who kill for fun. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour.

Juror 8 suggests a secret ballot, from which he will abstain, and agrees to change his vote if the others unanimously vote "guilty". He is the tenth to vote "not guilty"; played by Ed Begley.Essay Murder Case: 12 Angry Men In the film, 12 Angry Men, twelve disgruntled, sweat-covered jurymen are debating the verdict of a murder case.

The audience gets unique insight into the deliberation of an emotionally-charged case. 12 Angry Men Questions and Answers. The Question and Answer section for 12 Angry Men is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

Analysis of 12 Angry Men - In viewing 12 Angry Men, we see face to face exactly what man really is capable of being. We see different views, different opinions of. 12 Angry Men () on IMDb: Plot summary, synopsis, and more IMDb. Movies, TV & Showtimes.

Spirited Away ( A man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an year-old man accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence.

Sep 29,  · In form, "12 Angry Men" is a courtroom drama. In purpose, it's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence.

It has a kind of stark simplicity: Apart from a brief setup and a briefer epilogue, the entire film takes place within a small New York City jury room, on 4/4. Apr 17,  · “12 Angry Men” Essay The movie "12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's decision on a capital murder case.

A man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a .

12 angry essay man summary
Rated 0/5 based on 60 review